You also can view followings:
Chapter VIII
Paul's Epistle
In
this section, please pay special attention to the words "cover" and
"uncover". The Romans had the idea that the covering for the
head was some human- made material put on one's head; "uncover" to
remove that material. Did Paul use those words with the same meaning as the Romans
did? Or did Paul mean "cover" and "uncover" with the
sense of God-made material, that is, to cover with one’s own human hair, not in
the Roman sense of piece of material, but Jewish sense which refers to a person’s
own hair?
A
few years before Paul wrote the first epistle to the Corinthians, he was in
Corinth for a year and a half. After he left Corinth, he went to Ephesus,
where an incident
of them speaking in tongues was
recorded; (Acts
19:6). Paul explained this in his epistle, first Corinthians Chapter
14. Another incident
occurred after he had left
Corinth when he
went to Cenchrea. There Paul did something drastic by shaving his head, for he
was under a vow, Acts
18:18. How aware were the Corinthians of such
Jewish customs? The
Epistle, first Corinthians may
not have had anything to do with the vow. But looking at the
vow first, this
passage did not use the
word vow, but pray. James
Here, Paul might be using the word “prayer” in
generalizing and including the meaning of “vow,” which is the action he took.
A person who takes a vow can be called
a “votary”. A votary may be a Nazirite, or a positive or negative vow
taker--that is, he or she may either promise to do something or promise to refrain
from doing something. When a votary takes a vow, he cherishes his long
hair during the duration of the vow, but now Paul calls having long hair a
disgrace, a dishonor to his head. There seems to be a contradiction between a
votary's action and Paul's statement. However, the contradiction disappears
when we realize that taking a vow comes in two stages. First, during the
duration of his vow of separation, no razor may be used on his head; he is to
keep his hair long. When the period of separation is complete, he is to
uncover or shave his head. Basically, Paul is talking about this second stage
to explain to the Corinthians why he shaved his head
Check the following words that show how God expressed his
idea about the hair he created in Chapter 6 of the book of Numbers.
Verse
5: "cherishing
the long hair of the head”
Verse 7:
"because the vow of
God is upon him on his head”
Verse 18:
"shave the head of his consecration”
Verse 19:
"he has shaved off his holy hair” (actually “vow” instead of “hair,” in the original language)
The story of Samson is another Old
Testament example. Although not much explanation is given, somehow when God
dealt with Samson, his anointing stayed with his long hair. As long as he had
his long hair God’s power was with him. God never required of him to have
anything else on his head.
1 Corinthians
Look at what Paul said
about men and women separately. First, for men:
Verse 4:
". . with his head
covered dishonors his head"
Verse 7:
"A man ought not
cover his head"
Verse 14:
"if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him"
In verse 4 and 7, he
talked about "cover head." In verse 14, he talked about "long
hair."
Now, for women;
Verse 5:
"her head uncovered
dishonors her head"
Verse 6:
". . . disgrace for woman to have her hair cut . . covers her head"
Verse 15:
"If a woman has long hair it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering?"
In verse 5 and 6, he talked
about "head uncover" or "hair cut" as a dishonor or a disgrace. Is Paul
suggesting "head uncover" and "hair cut" are different
actions but the
same rephrased action? If they are
the same action,
cutting the hair
is the same as uncovering head,
nothing else.
In
reverse, “not cutting the
hair” means “cover the head with hair”.
Verse 15 says, “For long hair is
given to her as a covering"
This
passage is also understood to explain headship of man. The book of Numbers Chapter
30 also explains about the headship of man between God and the woman when she
takes a vow. When the daughter, or wife, takes a vow, her father or husband
hears her vows, and her father should hold his peace with her or forbid her. It
is a responsibility given to him for his daughter or wife.
To
summarize: The stola and palla (a shawl worn over the head) were Roman fashions
for respectable women in the first Century. Prostitutes were not allowed to
dress in this fashion, but were restricted to wearing only the dark toga. In
the Greek city of
A reader might ask, how would we
understand I Cor. 11:6?
“if the woman is not veiled, she should shave off her hair.”
As
mentioned before, after Valentinian inserted the word ‘veil’ instead of keeping the original word ‘power’ for over a
thousand years from the pulpit, this word ‘veil’ tainted the whole passage
leaving one to think anytime the word ‘cover’ appears the meaning should
automatically be switched to ‘veil’.
It is not
known what the Corinthians questions were but try to read the following passage
without changing, in your head, the word from ‘cover’ to ‘veil.’ Additionally,
it does not say, cover her hair but cover her head, scalp.
NIV (New International Version) I Cor. 11:6 reads:
“If a woman does not cover her head, she should have her
hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut or
shaved off, she should cover her head.”
NIV I Cor.
“but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long
hair is given to her as a covering.”
Paul never said anything about veil. Using manmade materials
on women’s head was not Paul’s intention.
Conclusion
1 The early Roman Church, Tertullian, tried to Christianize Roman
fashions by trying to make Paul’s epistle endorse wearing the
palla as a Christian religious practice.
2 The early Roman Church, Ambrose, also
tried to carry on the Vestal Virgin’s Fillet
as Consecrated Christian Virgin’s bridal veil.
3. Mystery loving Valentinian’s insertion of word ‘veil’ instead
of ‘power’ was carried on without being challenged through Middle Ages.
Ambrose, bishop of Milan, even worked with three emperors in
his life time. He carried the bridal veil tradition for consecrated Christian
virgins like Vestal Virgins for fillets. He did not even mention anything about
prayer veils. Rather, he discouraged
having curls and ornaments but encouraged natural long hair for a woman to
cover her head.
Now, after reading this far, readers might be
convinced, woman’s hair is given to them as covering.
Then what was Paul’s intention by saying in chapter
11, verse 10?
“The woman ought to have a sign of
authority on her head.“
According to the Numbers 6:7 regarding the law of
the Nazirites:
" the vow of God is upon him on his head”
Paul’s statement reminds us of how God dealt with
our hair when we take the vow.
Maybe the
Corinthian’s were asking Paul after seeing him shave his head, what a woman
should do in case of taking her vow.
updated: 09/17/2016